What is sharding in the realm of blockchain technology?
Why is it important and how is it solving the problem of scalability
Web 3.0, often termed the decentralised web, represents the next evolution of the internet, emphasising user control, privacy, and peer-to-peer interactions. At its core, blockchain technology powers this vision by providing a decentralized and transparent framework for transactions and data storage. With its immutable ledgers and trustless consensus mechanisms, blockchain serves as the foundational infrastructure for Web 3.0, enabling decentralised applications (DApps), token economies, and a shift from data silos controlled by centralised entities to a more open and user-centric digital ecosystem.
Blockchains acting as digital ledgers record transactions across multiple computers in a way that ensures the data is transparent, immutable, and secure. By design, once information is stored on a blockchain, it becomes resistant to modification, fostering trust and eliminating the need for intermediaries.
However, while revolutionary, Blockchain has faced significant scalability challenges. These challenges have become more pronounced as the adoption of blockchain and cryptocurrencies has grown
Let’s understand what these challenges are.
Limited throughput
Traditional blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum can process a limited number of transactions per second (TPS). For instance, Bitcoin's throughput is often limited to 3-7 TPS, while Ethereum's is around 15-45 TPS. In contrast, centralized systems like Visa claim to handle thousands of TPS.
Block size and frequency
Increasing the block size or reducing the time between blocks can improve scalability. However, larger blocks can lead to centralization since only well-resourced nodes could store the ever-growing blockchain. Reducing block time can lead to more forks, which can compromise security.
Network latency
For a transaction to be added to the blockchain, it must be propagated across a global network of nodes. This propagation takes time, and as the network grows, latency can become a bottleneck.
Storage constraints
Every full node in a blockchain network stores the entire history of the blockchain. As the chain grows, storage requirements increase, potentially leading to centralization as only nodes with significant storage capacity can participate.
Consensus mechanisms
Proof-of-Work (PoW), used by Bitcoin and many other blockchains, is energy-intensive and time-consuming. While it offers high security, it's not the most efficient for scalability.
State growth
Blockchains like Ethereum that support smart contracts have a "state" that tracks the current information of all accounts. As more applications and users interact with the chain, the state grows, leading to increased processing and storage demands.
Fee market
During times of congestion, users compete to have their transactions processed by offering higher fees. This can lead to unpredictable and sometimes exorbitant transaction costs.
Cross-chain interoperability
As multiple blockchains emerge, there's a need for seamless interaction between them. Achieving this without compromising on speed and security is a challenge.
Solutions like sharding, off-chain transactions, layer 2 scaling solutions (e.g., Lightning Network for Bitcoin and Rollups for Ethereum), and alternative consensus mechanisms (e.g., Proof-of-Stake and Proof of History) are being developed to address these challenges. However, finding the right balance between security, decentralisation, and scalability remains a pivotal concern.
So how does sharding help blockchains solve their scalability challenges?
At its core, sharding is a database partitioning technique that divides a larger database into smaller, more manageable pieces, or "shards". Each shard contains a portion of the data and can be processed independently, allowing for parallel processing and increased throughput.
In the context of blockchain, sharding is applied to divide the network into smaller partitions, each capable of processing transactions and smart contracts. This means that not every node in the network needs to validate every transaction, as was the case with earlier blockchain models. Instead, specific nodes validate specific shards, distributing the workload and increasing the overall capacity of the network.
Imagine you have a huge LEGO castle. It's so big that it takes up your entire playroom. Every time you want to add a new piece or change something, you have to walk around the whole castle, find the right spot, and then make the change. It takes a lot of time, and sometimes, you wish you could just work on a small part of the castle without having to deal with the whole thing.
Now, imagine if you could break that castle into smaller sections, or "shards," and each of your friends could work on one shard at a time. This way, you and your friends can build or change parts of the castle faster because you're all working on different pieces at the same time.
That's kind of how "sharding" works in the world of computers and the internet.
Traditional blockchains, like Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0, operated on a principle where every transaction was validated by every node in the network. This ensured a high degree of security but limited the number of transactions the network could handle per second.
Sharding addresses the scalability issue by allowing multiple transactions to be processed concurrently across different shards. This parallel processing significantly increases the number of transactions a blockchain can handle per second.
With 64 shards proposed, Ethereum 2.0 aims to increase its throughput by a factor of 64, making it more suitable for the high transaction volumes expected in DeFi applications. Each shard has its own set of information and transactions which lessens load helps by spreading out the work. Each shard can then process its own transactions, so everything doesn't get jammed up in one place.
Implications for DeFi
By dividing a blockchain into smaller, parallel segments or "shards", sharding has been identified as a potential solution to the scalability challenges faced by many blockchain platforms. In the context of Decentralised Finance (DeFi), which has seen explosive growth and demands high transaction throughput, sharding offers several benefits:
Increased throughput
One of the primary advantages of sharding is the ability to process multiple transactions concurrently across different shards. This parallel processing can significantly boost the number of transactions a blockchain can handle per second, accommodating the high transaction volumes typical in DeFi platforms.
Reduced transaction costs
Scalability issues often lead to network congestion, resulting in higher transaction fees as users compete for block space. By increasing the network's capacity, sharding can help reduce congestion and, consequently, transaction fees, making DeFi operations more cost-effective.
Faster confirmation times
With sharding, transactions can achieve faster confirmation times due to the parallel processing of transactions across shards. This speed is crucial for DeFi applications where timely execution can be essential, especially in trading or arbitrage scenarios.
Enhanced user experience
The combination of faster transaction speeds and reduced costs directly translates to a better user experience. This is vital for the broader adoption of DeFi platforms, as users typically gravitate towards platforms that offer seamless and efficient operations.
Scalable smart contracts
DeFi platforms rely heavily on smart contracts. Sharding can allow for the execution of complex smart contracts that might be too resource-intensive for non-sharded blockchains, paving the way for more sophisticated DeFi products and services.
Network longevity
As DeFi platforms grow in user base and transaction volume, the underlying blockchain must be able to handle this growth. Sharding provides a path for sustainable growth, ensuring that the network remains efficient as it scales.
Decentralisation and security
One of the concerns with some scalability solutions is the potential compromise on decentralisation. Sharding, when implemented correctly, can maintain a high degree of decentralisation, ensuring that the foundational principles of DeFi – open access and censorship resistance – remain intact.
While sharding offers numerous benefits, it's not without challenges. Inter-shard communication can be complex, as transactions that affect multiple shards need coordination. There's also the potential risk of reduced security in individual shards compared to the security of the entire network. These challenges need to be solved for. For the moment though, sharding can play a pivotal role in the evolution of DeFi, addressing some of the most pressing challenges related to scalability. As DeFi continues to push the boundaries of traditional finance, scalable and efficient underlying infrastructures, potentially achieved through techniques like sharding, will be crucial.
In my day job, I work for Google across a host of things. In my spare time, I write to learn and build products. You can follow me on Twitter/X at HacrkLife